Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 20(1): 281, 2020 Nov 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33167910

RESUMO

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 20(1): 220, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32873237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and hypoxaemia are associated with morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of lung ultrasound (LUS) to diagnose PPCs in patients suffering from hypoxaemia after general anaesthesia and compare the results to those of thoracic computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Adult patients who received general anaesthesia and suffered from hypoxaemia in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) were analysed. Hypoxaemia was defined as an oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SPO2) less than 92% for more than 30 s under ambient air conditions. LUS was performed by two trained anaesthesiologists once hypoxaemia occurred. After LUS examination, each patient was transported to the radiology department for thoracic CT scan within 1 h before returning to the ward. RESULTS: From January 2019 to May 2019, 113 patients (61 men) undergoing abdominal surgery (45 patients, 39.8%), video-assisted thoracic surgery (31 patients, 27.4%), major orthopaedic surgery (17 patients, 15.0%), neurosurgery (10 patients, 8.8%) or other surgery (10 patients, 8.8%) were included. CT diagnosed 327 of 1356 lung zones as atelectasis, while LUS revealed atelectasis in 311 of the CT-confirmed zones. Pneumothorax was detected by CT scan in 75 quadrants, 72 of which were detected by LUS. Pleural effusion was diagnosed in 144 zones on CT scan, and LUS detected 131 of these zones. LUS was reliable in diagnosing atelectasis (sensitivity 98.0%, specificity 96.7% and diagnostic accuracy 97.2%), pneumothorax (sensitivity 90.0%, specificity 98.9% and diagnostic accuracy 96.7%) and pleural effusion (sensitivity 92.9%, specificity 96.0% and diagnostic accuracy 95.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound is feasible, efficient and accurate in diagnosing different aetiologies of postoperative hypoxia in healthy-weight patients in the PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT03802175 , 2018/12/05, www.ClinicalTrials.gov.


Assuntos
Hipóxia/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Atelectasia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/normas , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hipóxia/etiologia , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oximetria/métodos , Derrame Pleural/etiologia , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
3.
Ann Palliat Med ; 9(4): 1506-1517, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32648454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although lung-protective strategies are widely used in thoracic surgery, postoperative atelectasis can still occur. Both lung ultrasound (LUS) and diaphragmatic excursion assessments are accurate and noninvasive for bedside imaging and examination. This study aimed to test the feasibility of using LUS during the perioperative period of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and to continuously evaluate aeration changes through LUS examination and diaphragmatic excursion assessment. METHODS: Between January 2019 and May 2019, data were prospectively collected from patients that were scheduled to undergo a VATS with one-lung ventilation (OLV). LUS was performed at four specific timepoints: before the induction of general anesthesia (timepoint A), 5 minutes after intubation (timepoint B), at the end of surgery (timepoint C), and 15 minutes after extubation (timepoint D). Diaphragmatic excursion assessment was performed only at the first (timepoint A) and last timepoints (timepoint D) for the use of paralytics during surgery. RESULTS: This study included 80 consecutive patients (37 men, 43 women). Among them were patients undergoing lobectomy (14 patients; 17.5%), segmentectomy (35 patients, 43.8%), wedge resection (19 patients; 23.8%), or mediastinal tumor resection (12 patients, 15.0%). LUS was possible for all patients. As a result, LUS helped detect postoperative atelectasis in 12 patients (15.0%). Among them were 4 (33.3%) lung resection patients and 8 (66.7%) mediastinal tumor resection patients. Pneumothorax and small effusions were also diagnosed through LUS examination. There was significant aeration loss throughout the surgery from the start of induction (P<0.001). We discovered that changes in LUS scores were found to be associated with an increase of diaphragmatic excursions after assessment (Spearman's r=-0.54, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LUS is feasible during all phases of the perioperative period in VATS and can facilitate the early investigation of perioperative atelectasis. Perioperative LUS and diaphragmatic excursion assessment are also feasible for the continuous assessment of aeration loss in patients undergoing VATS.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Atelectasia Pulmonar , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Atelectasia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
4.
World J Emerg Med ; 11(1): 27-32, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31893000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The influence of surgical delay on mortality and morbidity has been studied extensively among elderly hip fracture patients. However, most studies only focus on the timing of surgery when patients have already been hospitalized, without considering pre-admission waiting time. Therefore, the present study aims to explore the influence of admission delay on surgical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we recorded admission timing and interval from admission to surgery for included patient. Other covariates were also collected to control confounding. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. The secondary outcomes were 1-month mortality, 3-month mortality, ICU admission and postoperative pneumonia. We mainly used multivariate logistic regression to determine the effect of admission timing on postoperative outcomes. An additional survival analysis was also performed to assess the impact of admission delay on survival status in the first year after operation. RESULTS: The proportion of patients hospitalized on day 0, day 1, day 2 after injury was 25.4%, 54.7% and 66.3%, respectively. And 12.6% patients visited hospital one week later after injury. Mean time from admission to surgery was 5.2 days (standard deviation 2.8 days). Hospitalization at one week after injury was a risk factor for 1-year mortality (OR 1.762, 95% CI 1.026-3.379, P=0.041). CONCLUSION: Admission delay of more than one week is significantly associated with higher 1-year mortality. As a supplement to the current guidelines which emphasizes early surgery after admission, we also advocate early admission once patients get injured.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...